Ray W. Nettleton, LLC
Areas of Expertise: Wireless Technologies
Dr. Nettleton is a consultant and expert witness in wireless technologies and networking. His career has included roles as an entrepreneur, corporate officer, international businessperson, engineer, educator, author, lecturer, and researcher. He is a life member of the IEEE.
Expert Witness
- Expert witness in patent infringement and other civil, regulatory and criminal matters
- IP litigation firms include Nixon Peabody, Wilmer Hale, Keker Van Nest, Latham Watkins, McKool Smith, Orrick, Hogan & Hartson, Freeborn & Peters, Patton Boggs, Kenyon & Kenyon, Finnegan Henderson, Alston Bird, Workman Nydegger, Ropes & Gray, Baker Botts, Wilson Sonsini
- Provided expert witness testimony to Government hearings in Colombia, Brazil, New Zealand, Poland, UK, Ireland, South Africa, Philippines, and the FCC
International telecommunications businessperson & consultant
- Consulting clients include Ball Wireless, Milcom Technologies, MCI, Avantel de Mexico, United International Holdings, Wireless Spectrum Inc., Vesuvius Inc., Superconducting Core Technologies, iSherpa, Sequel, Motorola, NASA, U S Navy & Air Force, and others
- Performed business and technical feasibility and due diligence, technical and market strategy, and regulatory affairs consulting in the UK, Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Bolivia, Colombia, Argentina, South Africa, most of Europe, Korea, India, China, Japan, Philippines, etc.
Entrepreneur and Corporate Officer
- Co-founder and Chief Technology Officer, Formus Communications, an international wireless CLEC with license coverage exceeding 200 million pops in Europe
Innovative telecommunications engineer & Researcher
- Awarded the first two patents in CDMA technology for cellular telephone systems, issued in 1978 (stemming from PhD thesis research) and ultimately leading to the worldwide adoption of CDMA for 3G cellphone technology.
- Conducted research in system performance, power control and code design for CDMA, and in dynamic channel allocation for FDMA and TDMA systems.
- Established the first LMDS cellular propagation and interference trials (Phoenix, Arizona)
- Created the Boulder Industry PCS Test Bed and conducted trials with multiple vendors
- Designed the first 60GHz radio modem to use a Fast Fourier Transform-based algorithm to track very wide Doppler dynamics created by fighter aircraft motion
Educator, Author, Lecturer
- Professor Adjunct, University of Colorado – Boulder, Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program and the Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research
- Taught electrical engineering at Michigan State University, University of Maryland, Johns Hopkins University, and University of Denver
- Over 85 articles in industry publications, conference proceedings and technical journals
: Expert Witness Summary 2011-2015[1]
- United States District Court for New Jersey
High Point SARL vs. T-Mobile
Case no. 2:12-cv-01453-DMC-JAD, 2012- ongoing
Client: High Point SARL, represented by Dechert. Consulting. CDMA patents
- US District Court Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division
US vs. Huanjan Jin
Case no. 80 CR 192, (Theft of trade secrets and economic espionage), 2010-2011 concluded
Client: Federal Defender Program, Chicago. Prepared expert disclosure, testified at trial. iDEN technology.
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CellPort vs. Peiker
Civil Action No. 09-CV-01007-MSK-MJW, 2010-2013 concluded
Client: CellPort, represented by Hutchinson Black & Cook. Product testing, report, deposition. Vehicular handset cradle patents.
- United States International Trade Commission Washington DC
Nokia vs. Apple
Investigation No. 337-TA-771, 2011- concluded
Client: Nokia, represented by Alston Bird. Pre-litigation consultations. Smartphone, positioning and dual-RAT patents
- U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Wilmington Division
Nokia vs. Apple
Case no. 09 CV 791, 2011- concluded
Client: Nokia, represented by Alston Bird. Pre-litigation consultations. Battery saving, dual mode cellular, determination of external connected device, Bluetooth patents.
- United States International Trade Commission Washington DC
| Sony vs. LG Investigation no. 337-TA-758, 2011- concluded Client: Sony, represented by Kenyon & Kenyon. Product testing and expert report. HDPSA cell change, adaptive voice codec, modulation patents. |
- State of South Carolina Court of Common Pleas Seventh Judicial Circuit
| Joseph & Beverly Tonkovic vs. E.J. Pope & Son, Carl Bryson & Sons, et al | |||
| Cases no. 10-CP-42-3212 and 11-CP-42-0872, 2011- concluded | |||
| Client: Tonkovic, represented by Michael E Spears, PA. Pre-trial consulting. Cellphone location. 8. United States International Trade Commission Washington DC HTC vs. Apple Investigation No. 337-TA-72, 2012- concluded Client: HTC, represented by Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner. Prepared test plan. Battery saving patents. 9. United States Patent & Trademark Office
|
- United States District Court Western District Of Wisconsin
| Motorola Mobility & General Instrument vs. Microsoft |
| Case nos. 10-cv-00699, (transferred to Western District of Washington), 10-cv-00700, 2012- ongoing |
| Client: Motorola Mobility, represented by Ropes & Gray. Pre-litigation consulting. Optimized messaging patent. |
- United States District Court Southern District Of Florida
| Motorola Mobility & General Instrument vs. Microsoft |
| Case no. 10-cv-24063, 2012- ongoing (transferred to Western District of Washington) |
| Client: Motorola Mobility, represented by Ropes & Gray. Pre-litigation consulting. Messaging patent. |
- Orange County, CA Superior Court
| Orange County vs. Murphy & Krasnoperov |
| Case no. 07NF2970, 2011, concluded [pro bono] |
| Client: Charles Anthony Murphy, represented by Molfetta & Wasserman. Technical consulting. Cell phone location.
|
- State of Iowa District Court 8th District
State v. Christopher Pullman
Cause no. FECR 316896, 2012- concluded
Client: Office of the State Public Defender. Non-testifying technical consulting. Cellphone location.
- Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List [Canada]
Commissioner of Competition v Chatr Wireless and Rogers Communications
Case no. CV-10-8993-00CL, 2012- concluded
Client: Commissioner of Competition, Canada, Represented By Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin. Prepared expert report. False advertising – dropped call statistics.
- United States District Court, Southern District of California
ViaSat et al v. Space Systems/Loral et al
Case No. 3:12-cv-00260-H-WVG – 2012- ongoing
Client: ViaSat represented by Quinn Emanuel. Pre-litigation consulting. Satellite patents.
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Apple v Samsung
Case no. 12-cv-000630-LHK, 2012- concluded
Client: Samsung represented by Quinn Emanuel. Pre-litigation consulting. 3Gpp HSPA patents.
- United States District Court, Northern District Of Illinois
Cisco et al v Innovatio IP Ventures
Case no. 11-cv-9308, 2011- ongoing
Client: Innovatio IP Ventures. Site inspection, code review. Prepared expert report, rebuttal expert report. Deposed. Testified at trial. IEEE 802.11 patents.
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Mosaid v Marvell et al
Case no. 2:11cv179, 2011- 2013, concluded
Client: Mosaid, represented by McKool Smith. Prepared expert report. IEEE 802.11 patents.
- United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apple v Motorola Mobility
Case no. 3:12cv00355, 2012- concluded
Client: Motorola Mobility, represented by Winston Strawn. Prepared expert report. Breach of contract.
- Superior Court of California, County of Orange
People v Ronald Jordan
Case No. 11HF2340, 2013-, concluded [pro bono]2
Client: Ronald Jordan, represented by Robison Harley. Testified at trial. Location of cell phone.
- U.S. District Court Northern District of California, San Francisco Div.
Barnes & Noble et al v LSI Corp & Agere Systems
Case No. 11-CV-02709-EMC-LB, 2012-2014, concluded
Client: LSI, represented by Fenwick & West. Reviewed code, prepared declaration
- U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
MTel vs. RIM
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-1652-M, 2013-, ongoing
Client: MTel, represented by Reed & Scardino – related to cellular messaging and simulcasting. Infringement analysis. Testified at deposition.
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
MTel vs. Sprint Nextel
Case No. 2:12-cv-832-JRG-RSP, 2013-2014, concluded
Client: MTel, represented by Reed & Scardino – related to cellular messaging and simulcasting. Infringement analysis, prepared declaration
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
MTel vs. Apple
Case No. 2:13-cv-258-JRG-RSP, 2013-2014, concluded
Client: MTel, represented by Reed & Scardino – related to cellular messaging and simulcasting. Prepared reports, testified in depositions and at trial
- U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, Patent Trial & Appeal Board
NEC IPR vs. CCE
Case No. 2:13-cv-258-JRG-RSP, 2014, concluded
Client: NEC, represented by Morgan Lewis – related to cellular neighbor cell information. Inter Partes Review of U. S. Patent no. 6,809,923. Prior art analysis, prepared Expert Declaration under 37 C.F.R. § 1.1328
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
MTel vs. Samsung
Case No. 2:13-cv-258-JRG-RSP, 2013-2015, concluded
Client: MTel, represented by Reed & Scardino – related to cellular messaging. Prepared reports, testified in depositions and at trial
- Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales, General Division
Voxson Pty Ltd. vs. Telstra Corporation et al
Case No. NSD2436, 2013- ongoing
Client: Voxson, represented by Dibbs Barker – related to mobile location technologies. Infringement analysis, prepared declaration
- International Court of Arbitration, International Chamber of Commerce
Interdigital Communications Inc. et al vs. Huawei et al
Case No. 20171/RD, 2014- ongoing
Client: Interdigital, represented by Wilson Sonsini – infringement damages related to wireless patent portfolio. Prepared report, testified at deposition and in tribunal.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial & Appeal Board
Inter Partes Review of U. S. Patent 6,809,923
Trial Number: IPR2014-01131, 2014
Client: ZTE and HTC, represented by Pillsbury (ongoing). Prior art analysis, prepared Expert Declaration under 37 C.F.R. § 1.1328
- U.S. district Court, District of Delaware
M2M Solutions LLC vs. Sierra Wireless
Case No. 12-030-RGA, 2012- ongoing
Client: M2M Solutions, represented by Foley Lardner – related to wireless monitoring devices. Prepared report
- U.S. district Court, District of Delaware
M2M Solutions LLC vs. Enfora/Novatel
Case No. 12-032-RGA, 2012- ongoing
Client: M2M Solutions, represented by Foley Lardner – related to wireless monitoring devices. Prepared report, testified at deposition
- U.S. district Court, District of Delaware
M2M Solutions LLC vs. Motorola / Telit
Case No. 12-033-RGA, 2012- ongoing
Client: M2M Solutions, represented by Foley Lardner – related to wireless monitoring devices. Prepared report, testified at deposition
[1] In this section “dates”, “ongoing” and “concluded” refer to my professional involvement with the matter. The actual disposition of each case is publicly available at www.pacer.gov (except for Arbitrations, Tribunals, Australia, Netherlands and Canada cases)